Homo's and HIV/AIDS

Men who have sex with men comprise about 2% of the U.S. population. 

But they are the risk group most affected by HIV/AIDS according to the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

CDC reports that most gay and bisexual men acquire HIV through anal sex. This the riskiest type of sex for transmitting HIV.

In 2010, says the CDC, among persons newly infected with HIV, 63% were from male-on-male sex, while 52% of the homosexual population is already HIV positive.

On National Gay Men’s HIV/AIDS Awareness Day, the CDC stressed the continuing and disproportionate impact of HIV and AIDS on gay/homosexual men.

Is this disproportionate? Is the outcome is unfair? Should the gay/homosexual community proceed with a class action in the courts against the straight community? Should the straight community be forced to increase their unsafe sexual practices so that the percentages become more ‘proportionate.’

So why are the percentages so high in the gay/homosexual community? Lust. Men are naturally more predatory in their sex-drive, and what a bonus to meet up with another person who is equally lustful –another male. This results in having more partners compared to straight men, and 52% of those male partners are HIV/AIDS positive.

The problem with the predatory sexual behaviour of men, particularly gay/homosexual men, is that straight men are also hunted down. While encounters like this may be once off, straight men and their families become victims of the HIV/AIDS scourge.

In our drive in being politically correct, all sorts of euphemisms have been invented. Examples are, correctional facility(jail), put to sleep (euthanasia), uterus evacuation (abortion), adult entertainment (porn), sex-worker (prostitute, whore), partially proficient (unqualified), Gay (bugger, sodomite). Homo- bi- hetero- sexual is scientific terminology.

Well that is what it is. Bugger, Sodomite. Even if you say gay. That is what you mean.

Fokjo!